Some individuals agree with the thought of free healthcare for everyone, although the fact that others think2 it is not an essential need. While this system offers humanitarian benefits, it also presents certain financial drawbacks. This essay will examine both advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, the primary benefit of free healthcare for all is access to certain treatments and remedies, without having to spend a fortune. As a result, no unnecessary deaths of educated and prominent people would take place, leading to an increase in scientific research and studies. There are numerous examples of this, one of which is Marsha Joe, head scientist of space studies, who was on the brink of death in 2020 because of covid infection. Despite this traumatic experience, she survived and her research led to a wider knowledge about outer space.
On the other hand, the main disadvantages of making healthcare free to all are financial breakdowns, which are possible if people will start abusing remedies2 and other medical treatments. Furthermore, with no payment requirements for hospitalisation, and medical examinations, healthy individuals might misuse all of those available services, that would lead to the government’s enormous expenditures on hospitals. There are more than many examples of cases like this, one of which is «municipal medical centre of Saint-Petersburg». That is a free clinic for locals in the Leningrad area, which was closed in 2019 because of the overuse and lack of financial support.
To sum up, the idea of providing free healthcare to everyone is essential and beneficial, although society should consider those services based on their needs. In my opinion, this approach is a positive one for our world.