The question of whether we should preserve endangered species or solely protect a small number of beneficial animals has been a subject of intense debate. While I agree that protecting useful animals is a must as they provide food and company, I believe that we also assume the responsibility to safeguard other creatures on Earth as they are essential in the ecosystems.
Some advocate for solely ensuring the welfare of a small proportion of useful animals due to their huge impact on human beings’ physical health. For example, chickens are a great source of proteins which are crucial for developing muscle; dairy cows provide us with milk. Without these sources of food, human beings will lack essential nutrients, impacting their overall health and immune function. Moreover, domesticated animals are believed to have a therapeutic effect. Cats and dogs are good examples. They offer individuals companionship and a reservoir of happiness, helping them retreat when they encounter hardships or stresses in school or work settings. Wild animals, on the other hand, can not be both food and friends because of their elusive nature, so protecting them is deemed to be unnecessary.
Despite the abovementioned arguments, I firmly subscribe to the idea of safeguarding all creatures inhabiting our planet. Each creature, irrespective of its immediate utility, holds significance in maintaining the intricate balance of our ecosystems. Every animal is a part of complex food chains that are paramount for other animals’ existence. Were a species to disappear, it could disrupt the delicate equilibrium that sustains life on Earth. For instance, the preservation of a predator species like the grey wolf indirectly benefits the environment by controlling the population of herbivores, such as deer.
In conclusion, although productive creatures directly benefit humans as a whole, we should also preserve other animals’ lives on this planet, particularly ones in danger of extinction.