In modern times, many categories of animals are at the doorstep of extinction. Society’s people are divided into two groups; some believe that nations and peoples should take initiatives to save them, while others argue that countries should focus more on human complications. In my opinion, both views are equally important. I will discuss both viewpoints in the following paragraph and give a conclusion.
Those who support the former viewpoint claim that all the creatures on planet Earth are equally important; any imbalance between humans and animals will create significant challenges in the future. For instance, eagles and crows are natural cleaners of the ecosystem. They eat any dead animal and help to decompose it. In India, eagles are rare to discover, which leads to significant delays in dead animal decomposition. In addition to this, as humans, it is our moral responsibility to save the animals that are on the verge of extinction.
On the contrasting side, people who hold another viewpoint say that governments should spend money and resources to solve problems for human beings, such as poverty, education, and hunger. Around 20% of the population lives under poverty right now all around the world; governments should help them by providing subsidies and incentive schemes so that they can live better lives. Furthermore,
To conclude the discussion, I would like to say that humans and animals are two sides of the same coin. From ancient times, they have lived and survived together. Saving animals from extinction is equally important as solving human problems. So, governments and individuals should give equal importance to both problems so the world could be a better place to live for all of us.