These days, people prioritize watching news on the internet rather than newspapers or TV programmes. While it provides access to data far more quickly, propaganda may also thrive on social media . From the relativistic point of view, the situation largely depends on people’s ability to fact-check information.
On the one hand, the internet makes the process of getting information significantly faster. In comparison to the television or newspaper ,which doesn’t provide accessibility 7/24, social media is available in any time and any location as long as you have got necessary gadgets like mobile phones, laptops or computers. It is the fact that such devices are provided in online and traditional stores that are specialized for this trade in every corner of the world, making the internet use rather common.
One the other hand, social media has become untrustworthy due to distortion and exaggeration. They not only give the misleading information but also disrupt one’s life with deliberate smear. For instance, paparazzi constantly follow famous people in order to turn the situation into something different and defamate celebrities’ reputation, all of which is because of getting more views and likes.
As a result, it is quite relevant if it is beneficial to have internet or not. Because it offers high amount of opportunities as well as disadvantages, letting the decision-making to people themselves. Were they to adopt checking reliability of the data, social media can be a blessing to many people as it offers knowledge that can be gained with affordable prices.
In conclusion, relying on the internet rather than a television or newspapers can be a double-edged sword for people as it provides both accessibility and unreliability to data. Consequently, people’s approach can lead to an ultimate decision.