It is widely believed that homemarkers should be offered state subsides from authority. While I agree with that, I would argue that we should based on their life circumstances.
In the one hand, government should have several policy for citizens unemployment to take care of their home. Firstly, the supportive money help improve the quality of their family. For example, with the state subsides from authority will help the family of citizen have enough for living. In addition, this increase mental health for all the members in the family as they do not need to put too much pressure on the person making money which alleviate their stress. Secondly, this enhance and increase more trust for people got supported from their government. As they will avoid to have a hectic schedule just for their living and can focus on their family or what they interested which improve knowledge for every corner of the citizens.
In the other hand, authority should limit people get state subsides. Initially, giving too much support can led to missing on budget of government. For instance, this can make the country losing on the development race between the world. Specially for some wealth family, as their living are already better than other people, so this support might lead to redundant for them. In addition, it can makes citizens lazy as they will depend on the policy marker. Because people got more support tend to choose stay at home and avoid to trying for their living or what they like as their know the authority always support them.
In conclusion, while we should offer housewives and househusbands supportive money, policy markers should depends on their life circumstances to support.