Parents,most of the time mothers,are responsible for taking care of their family. It is believed that a salary must given by government. I challenge for this view based on the main reasons.
The prominent reason why i disagree with given argument is that just by staying at home mothers can not help to the society. As a result,majority of full or part time workers,especially mothers would definitely leave their job and become jobless.
On the other hand, whenever the government starts giving a salary for housekeepers,this leads them to be overweight.For instance,over 60% of people are struggling with obesity and so being a stay-at-home mom or not doing physical exercises,even not working can be a realistic problem.
On the left hand this will cause great harm to society: by simply being unemployed,almost no one will even try to work
In conclusion, while the idea of providing a salary to parents, particularly mothers,for staying at home to care for their families, will reduce the motivation for working.Instead there should be balance while working for women,for example when they give a birth they need the amount of time for caring. In this situation,decreasing the time of working or keeping a balance between work and house chores . It may be more effective by doing this. Taking family, children or something etc, should put to the number one