It is argued that resident income should be excluded from paying taxes to the state. I am afraid that I have to disagree with the notion above. This essay will explore why spending taxes on the state is necessary.
The primary plus point of raising tax revenue is infrastructure development and maintenance. Taxes are allocated to the community’s fund, which is used to pay for the development of health care, transportation, and amenities. Thus, residents’ lives can dramatically improve. Moreover, communities can significantly decrease the number of hardships. Recent research concluded that the better community service and infrastructure are, the better residents’ lives are. A clear illustration can be seen in nations like Singapore, where having sustainable tax revenue makes people live comfortably and conveniently in most aspects of life.
Additionally, tax is the primary income for government operations, including public safety, sanitation, and urban development. Firefighters, doctors, and teachers’ sustainable income relies heavily on tax revenue. So, the absence of tax revenue can induce an economic crisis and severely impact a country’s development. Moreover, the allocation of tax revenue is instrumental in remarkable city projects, which are significant steps in the development of a country. A recent study found that the more government investment in urban projects, the better the living standard of residents is. Thus, tax revenue is the key to ensuring the convenience of people’s lives.
In conclusion, the existence of paying taxes to the state is undeniable. However, the advantages of spending taxes on the state outweigh its drawbacks. The allocation of tax is for improving infrastructure and government operations. Consequently, I assert that people should not keep all their income and should pay tax revenue.