To tackle the ongoing energy crisis, organizations around the world take a variety of initiatives. Experts depicted by their investigation that working less time in the office by reducing the working days is one of the options. This essay will demonstrate how fewer working days can transform employees into being more productive but also pose an imminent threat of repercussions of goodwill loss. Whilst acknowledging that there are drawbacks, the essay will argue that the benefits exceed them.
Pushing the working days to a less amount to address the energy crisis will see a rise in work efficiency and reduced apathy toward tasks among employees. Owing to this, they would not only be able to spend time with their loved ones but also liberate themselves from the monotony of doing their daily repetitive tasks. This ultimately will be evident in boosted job performance. For instance, after covid-19 many companies adopt the strategy to work 4 days instead of common culture of 5 days. The result has been satisfactory and appealing so far.
On the other hand, when the demand for services or products of a company sky-rocket during their peak times, they may fall short of supply and subsequently lose their good-will due to reduced working days. For example, when consumers won’t come across their desired products or services they demand, they will opt to abandon their loyalty to the company and resort to another. This may prelude to downfall of the company.
In conclusion, although fewer working days may be a harmful decision to take by the organisation, it greatly yields increased job performance which, along with strategic planning, can alleviate the blowback of this resolution. Hence, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages of reduced work days.”