Although some suggest that people should try to integrate into their host countries, others feel thate preserving their native cultures is of greater importance. This essay aims to shed light on both views before concluding with my position.
Supporters of complete assimilation argue that it has many practical benefits. By adapting to their host countries, people’s lives may become easier, as they become used to local traditions, lifestyles, food and employment. This would allow them to find work to earn money, maintain their health and gradually bridge connections with local people. By contrast, preserving native traditions may not be the best option, especially if such traditions stand the risk of triggering negative responses from local residents, or if local resources cannot accommodate such practices.
However, there are reasons why many would prioritize the preservation of their cultural heritage. The most important factor is that it gives them emotional support, reducing feelings of being lost and disoriented, which are very popular among those who find it hard to make new friends and settle in new environments. In countries where cultural diversity is appreciated, practicing native traditions is also encouraged, making this a meaningful activity that helps people to feel connected to their cultural roots not only in one generation but throughout many.
On balance, I believe in most situations, individuals should combine both of the given approaches. Intergrating into the host countries, embracing their traditions and lifestyles, would allow people to resume their daily lives, and this can be done while also honoring their cultural roots, so long as these do not conflict with local values.