Individuals hold distinctive views about adolescents using their smartphones at school. While allowing digital devices may bring several impacts on students, I would argue that prohibiting minors from using their mobile phones is a better option.
On the one hand, although giving children permission to use their own phones in classrooms may heavily affect their concentration, there is a merit behind this tendency. As electronic gadgets provide sophisticated visual materials which are relevant to the lessons, learners tend to become more about what they study as well as comprehend more easily. For instance, in the history discipline, students are able to observe through their mobile phones several videos or images relating to the selected historical events that they want to learn. Therefore, the children are likely to be intrigued by detailed and vivid patterns. Consequently, they will feel more excited about the lesson.
On the other hand, there are two main rationales explaining why juveniles’ access to their smartphones at school should be restricted. Firstly, there would be a discomfort among classroom’s participants if an arbitrary noise from one student’s phone suddenly appears. A message notification or an alarm, the whole class will be disrupted and either other students or teachers may feel frustrated. Secondly, minors are likely to fall into online temptations such as gambling, gaming or fraud, due to being taught or influenced by bad peers. Thus, this phenomenon may detrimentally affect the students’ outcome at school as well as their social behavior such as stealing parents’ money for gaming.
In conclusion, a myriad of residents assume that smartphones cater several beneficial impacts for their youngsters. However, I would argue that restricting the use of phones at school is better for students.