Nowadays, acceptance of a bad situation and having a freewill to change it has become a hot debate amongst different people in terms of socialogical and philosophical aspect. This essay with deep diver to analyze the opinion of both groups.
Having a freewill to desire, change and write your own destiny and selecting your fate is a strong and fairly new philosophical veiw. Many people agree with this view and strongly believe that as a human we have a freewill and we choose how to live our lives. Therefore, being stucked in a job with a low paycheck or doing an undesirable task or simillar things are not acceptable for them unless a person chooses to do so. These group also have a strong mindset to be and do whatever they want no matter how far or unachievable it is.
With a simple glance from a person outside the debate, the attitude of the group that believe in the fact that people should always accept a bad situation such as a bad financial perid, an unfulfilling job, a bad marriage etc. is somehow negative and unhealthy. However, it is more complicated than that; people with these opinion can be divided into two groups. first one, really accept every situation and do not try to change a bad one. However, second group are realistic people whom believe that as humans we are not able to change every situation that we want and we have a limited freewill and control over our lives.
Overall, both groups can present valid arguments. group with positive mindset have a great attitude to alter situaitons and would make an effort to be in an ideal one. Nevertheless, the opposing group believe that it is not possible to alter every bad situation such as a sadness of losing a dear family person. My opinion on this topic would fit somewhere between these two groups while slightly skewed toward positive ones.