In this day and age, the issue of education especially, teaching literature has attracted much concern from the public. Some individuals may claim that foreign literature is more essential. I, however, find myself totally unconvinced by that opinion for the following reasons.
On the one hand, national literature embodies the values of tradition, history, and cultural identity. By studying the works of local authors, children gain a deeper understanding of their roots and the struggles their ancestors went through. This not only helps them appreciate their country’s heritage but also instills in them a sense of pride and belonging. For instance, reading about patriotic heroes and historical events can inspire children to be more responsible and respectful citizens.
In addition, understanding one’s own literary tradition often lays the foundation for appreciating those of other cultures. It is widely recognized that self-awareness promotes empathy, and literature is no exception. When students are deeply rooted in their own culture, they are better equipped to approach foreign literature with an open yet grounded perspective. This balanced exposure encourages both respect for diversity and a stronger personal identity – both of which are crucial in today’s globalized world.
Opponents have recently argued that foreign literature offers global perspectives. This may be true. However, as far as I am concerned, its role is not as significant as developing a deep understanding of one’s own literary heritage.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe that governments and educators should place greater emphasis on teaching national literature, as it plays a vital role in shaping children’s cultural identity and values.