Today, it was argued that death penalty for crimes who had serious punishment is should be done or not. Although this had both benefits and drawbacks, in my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Being the death for extremely seriouse crimes offers tremendous benefits. Firstly, they should be punished as same as people who had killed by them. It is the mostly fare for both of them. They harted not only people who is killed by them, also whose family and friends may feel terribly sad. They should compensate for those people. Moreover, it will not be happened the same crimes again. If the crimes had the death penalty, they can never do the same crimes after they are amissioned to the social. Some people who live in the same city with him may feel beliefe and comfortable for that.
Certeinly, there are also some negative aspects for crimes. To beging with, people who crime’s family and close friends may feel so dissapointed and saddness for that. It is terrible situation for them because they do not have to gat any punishment such as feeling so bad. Furtheremore, we can not say that they are unkind 100% for sure. For example, they may ought to kill them for diferent reasons, otherwise they may be killed before they killed them. There are sometimes some mistakes that they are actually not the crimes because of the juddes mistakes.
In conclusion, despite some downsides, I beliebe that giving the death penalty for crimes who killed someone for some reasons involves many advantages. What some reasons they have, they should be punished as same as people who killed them.