It is argued that university education should be made accessible and free of charge for every student regardless of their financial ba ckgrounds. While I agree that everyone should have access to higher levels of education, it should not be made entirely free.
The decision to give everyone acc ess to university education has a crucial impact on society. As students get a chance to learn more advanced knowledge and training, this makes them qualified for the future job landscape. As a result, the performance of businesses can be elevated thanks to their contributions. Universities in Singapore, for instance, are accessible to the majority of students, though not everyone. With sufficient amounts of knowledge and training received in these universities, their workforce is indisputably of very high quality, leading to an incredibly robust economy. Without such policies, many people’s potential may not be discovered, preventing them from contributing to their communities.
However, I believe that university education should not be made entirely free of charge. While this may relieve the financial pressure for some students hailing from underprivileged backgrounds and allow them to focus on their studies, it could also lead to certain individuals belittling the va lue of this education. Because they no longer have to worry about paying for their failed classes, it is likely that they will not take studying seriously, which is a waste of governmental funds. Consequently, certain requirements should be set to prevent students from ignoring their duties, such as mainta ining decent grades.
In conclusion, while all individuals deserve to receive higher levels of education, as this can strengthen the workforce and economy of a nation, I firmly believe that it should not be fully free. This is because it may cause some students to ignore their responsibilities when the financial concern is eliminated.