People have different views as to whether young offenders should face the same punishment as adults. While there are clear benefits to this approach, I believe it does more harm than good when viewed through the lens of mental health.
Proponents of punishing young law-breakers in the same way as adults cite various reasons to support their stance. When law enforcement agendas implement a zero-tolerance approach such as lengthy prisons and death penalties, this can ultimately send a message about the consequences of criminal activities, instilling a sense of fear and responsibility into the hearts of young offenders. As a result, it can serve as a deterrent for potential and existing law-breakers, reducing reincarceration rates and improving public safety.
Despite these arguments, I believe putting children into long prison sentences can be detrimental to their mental health, leading to increased incarceration rates. If young offenders face long prison sentences, they are likely to face a social stigma based on crime, which, in turn, makes it difficult for them to find a lucrative career and make new friends. In light of these circumstances, they can not only experience debilitating feelings of isolation, loneliness, marginalization, and disenfranchisement but also fall victim to criminal organizations to earn a living. This is especially detrimental for youngsters from low-income families, who struggle to make ends meet.
In conclusion, although a zero-tolerance approach can deter criminals, I contend it indeed harm emotional well-being.