It is often argued that graffiti ought to be Nowied ches but most people completly disagree with it. Aavantages of this art would be self-expression and efficient advertising while others say drawbacks like wasting extra funds to repoint buildings and being confused while driving. In this essay,I am going to discuss both views and agree in favour of the latter
To begin with advantages of graffiti, which some people consider usefull, are a way to express feelings and being able to sufficiently advertise. By drawing various mages, individuals try to convey their interests of attitudes towards current events. It is a very suitable way for those who carrot Communicate with the public. What is more, these types of ard are acceptable in advertising. More clearly, most people prefer small advertisements involving only pictures than the long ones that seem boring for customers. For example, some well-liked brands like Microsoft offered people to publicize their brands through drawing images in public places. As a result, their income increased significantly thanks to these types of publicity.
On the other hand. There are a number of disadvantages like damaging to buildings and distracting drivers’ vigilence which makes people disagree with graffiti. Firstly, painting on buldings without permission of ownership are causing financial damages requiring restoration. Additionally, the image of certain buildings, such as schools or hospitals has changed for the worst. Secondly, one of the reasonable disadvantage is drivers’ losing their focus their focus at the sight of them. In other words, this would be a cause of car accidents. For instance, in the UK, where graffiti is common, drivers are usually at a loss of attention and confront mishaps. In my opinion, these consequences are likely to harm the community. Thus, I fully agree to prohibit such kinds of activities considering that this may lead to serious problems.