It has been a matter of concern, these days, that media should have some limitations while they cover any reporting. Some believe that media outlets should not breach the privacy of famous personalities, while others support it by saying that this the price they have to pay to be famous. In my opinion, celebrities should be captured as their fans want to be updated with what they are upto but they should not be filmed when are with thier families and at the time of paying condolosences at their loved one’s demise. This essay will discuss both viewpoints.
To begin with, paparazzi should abstain from capturim them when celebrities are enjoying their quality time with family. Having a hectic schedule throughout a year when they have to shoot for their upcoming projects to entertain the public makes them less available for their families. Consequently, sometimes it leads to breakup with their partners. Adittionally, famous personalities are also to be given space while performing the last rites to their loved ones. As it is generally seen, for example, big film stars have to go to pay respects when someone from their families died but they are shot there as well which leads invasions their private time.
On the other side, some individuals argue this is the price that celebrities have to pay to be famous since they are considered as the public property. Although celebrities become famous by working hard day and night, their fans simply love and admire them. As a result, there privacy is vulnerable to be compromised while people want to have a snap with them. Moreover, people are inspired and influenced whatever celebrities do in their private lives, so some people think they should be available everytime for their well-wishers.
In conclusion, photographers should respect celebrities’ personal time while they are with their families or are attending any private event rather than be shot everytime they go outside, though they are highly charmed or admired by their supporters.
