Around the world there are two type of people. The First like more live whitout change, and have they reason. The second type has a mainset is better change all the time. Both side have good arguments for this points of view, me too and in the next text we see these way to live.
The group who prefer not take a changes in generally like a chill life. This is great if you want a longer life, because the stress is a one of the main reason if the deterioreition in healt. Moreover, maintain everything in the same reduce the cortisol and do more peacefull your perspection. Other benefit on this, Is the possibility to think whit more clearly. Futhermore, Is to easy enjoy the simple things like talk whis the oldman, walk around of the city whit music or only contemplate the wood in the silences. May is borin for some people but in this times we have all day stimulate in the phones is not a bad choose less in the real life.
On the other side have some person who think the life in only one. They belive all day is adventure and not have other chances. This is a good point and is a great way to take the oportunity. The confort zone is the best example, fot this. Obviusly everywant like stay here but some negative side. If you take the desicion to get out, find some benefit as acept challenges and incremenal the own conficence. This type of the desicion open a lot door for the future for knows new people, new oportunity and is a way to advance in your life is if you want.
In conclusion, this both way to live your life is a personal desicion and so diferent see the same coin. In my opinion, I think is better try to progress and search the changes. May could be more stressfull and less chill but is best way to grow up and enjoy.