Band 5+: some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of Sports facilities. others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measure are required. discuss both those view and give your own opinion.

It is considered that increase in sports amenities would bring betterment in public health.

The opponents argue that other alternatives should opt because sports have minimum impact on human health. This essay will outline both arguments, and then conclusion will be drawn.

In most parts of the world, people are suffering from health-related issues such as diabetes, cardiac issues and obesity. The main reason is that they are not provided with recreation centers and sports facilities. If the state builds modern sports stadiums with gyms, cricket and football grounds in every big and small city, it will give an opportunity to their residence to adopt active lifestyle. For instance, Imran Khan, renown cricketer in his 60s living healthy and fit life without any co-morbidities.This example proves that living active lifestyle improve health condition.

On the other hand, opponent argues that other alternatives should beencouraged. First, delicious fast food should be cut down from everyday life. According to medical journals, these scrumptious food contain rich amount of cholesterol and lipids, these are leading agents for triple vessel disease and diabetes. Secondly, it is adviced that people should do their physical check-up at least once in three months. The regular check-up may enhance the chance to pick a disease at an early stage.

To sum up, it is clear from above arguments that out-door activities are beneficial for a healthy lifestyle. It seems to me that sports stadiums should be made for the well being of public health, but other alternatives cannot be overlooked.