Regulations and laws are there to organize and structure our life, and they resembles a border across human rights in which it must not be acrossed, else if sever counsequances will follow . Breaking a rule might cost you your own freedom. Thus, the rationale queation is on what bases do judges choose sentences to whether be prison or community services?
Frankly, the easiest and fasted way to teach someone a lesson is through the use of negative punichment, yet it is the most cruel method. Although it might be an excellent idea for major crime makers, it does affect the prisoner mental health negatively. Whereas the humans right clearly states that every human being health is a priority, and if neccessary deserves to have the medical care. This includes lawbreakers, would not we be contradicting ourslelves then? Considering the local community service for thoes of minor crimes, would be a reasonable approach full of mursey espically if the case belonged to a child under the age of 18. This would provides the very much needed lesson into their mind, and gurantee them a secons chance to make things right.
In conclusion, both punichment methods that lawbreakers usually undergoes the prison and the local community are theoritically useful, but there are more case details that the experiance eyes of the judge must consider. I am a strong believer of second chances and that humans cabable of change. Therefor, in my opinion that major lawbreakers that threatens other people safety mush be sent to prison Nevertheless, the others should be given alternatives while being under supervision of the police. In cases where troubles are made then the government would not be as forgivable and take a much more serious approach.