In contemporary, people think that international car-free day is effective solution to avoid air pollution. In contrast, others believe that there are better ways to struggle with this. From my overall perspective, car-free days are more beneficial for nature than another solutions.
On the one hand, International car-free days have significant benefits to deal with air pollution due to low level of emissions by car per day. This way could be right because one day without car would be more effective. As an example, if the government would create a definite day to not use cars, it would help to tackle air pollution. The clearest example is that day without vehicles would be more efficient owing to negative emissions by its. Thus, car-free day is significantly better way to cope with air pollution because of enhancement on the road across the city.
On the other hand, another part of individuals claim that other way to struggle with air pollution better than car-free days. As an other ways could be suggested different types of innovations, laws and events in the area. For instance, ecological innovations, such as hydrogen cars, could help to reduce the amount of harmful emissions by cars. In addition, new laws and events could give more opportunities to control the impact of emissions on air. For example, laws would require limited time to use cars per week, and events would be focus on motivate citizens to use vehicles less often.
To sum up, car-free days have largely impact to protect air and reduce emissions from cars. Also, different ways, such as green cars, laws and projects could help to reduce emissions. I believe that, day without car would be more efficient to protect our air.