Creativity weaves the tapestry of art. Dance, drama, music, painting, etc. are prominent examples of artistic expression showcased in various forms worldwide. While there exists a notion that creative mediums like these should be funded at a governmental level, there are others who believe this aid should be sourced through other routes. This essay will elaborate on both stances and summarize the writer’s opinion.
To begin with, creatively expressed art forms are symbolic depictions of the cultural and historical richness of a country. Therefore, financial aid received in an administrative capacity would strengthen the economic standing of this fraternity. They would be motivated and have numerous opportunities to uphold their country’s heritage by performing within and outside the respective nation. For example, the allowance of concerts and live shows in government- owned spaces can generate huge revenues for authorities as well as fetch the artists fame, income, and following.
On the other hand, considering monetary support from resources other than the government is completely valid, given the budget-based limitations faced by developing countries, especially in several major sectors. For instance, independent artists can collaborate with esteemed non-governmental and non-profit organizations and come up with fund-raising and other creative events of different genres, that would help with the goals of the organizations while also providing artists with a unique pathway for income and networking.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that creative mediums should only be partially funded by the government to ensure firm back- end support whenever necessary for those involved. Apart from this administrative stance, various social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook, which have gained momentum in the past few years, can help elevate the careers of many young aspirants.