Some people are of the claim that teenagers should possess full-time education is highly beneficial and should be implemented by the government. Personally, I partly agree with suggestion based on some major reasons that are explained in this essay.
On the one hand, there are some persuasive rationales’ that support the claim that juvenile should undertake full-time in knowledge becomes inefficient. This issue leads to problems for individuals under 18 years old to contribute to the development of education, slowing down economic growth. If the government giving full-time curriculum, such a problem would not occur, it not only forms a foundation for children’s future orientation, but also reduces the rate of juvenile delinquency in society. Moreover, education can boost economic development and transforming the quality of living of the whole population.
On the other hand, despite the idealistic of making full of time in education for adolescents under 18, it’s actual application could bring about many obstacles and problems. Given the very large number of students in many places, from good educational conditions to lack of infrastructure for education particularly in remote areas of developing and underdeveloped nations and the increasing cost of education at this stage, spending a large amount of time and money on learning would require massive lots of effort and financial resources. Unfortunately, many nations, especially developing ones, may not have a budget that is large enough for such coverage. Furthermore, minor who have full-time studying may not manage time between learning and entertainmentor doing household chores that help develop life-skills- which are essential for them. Beside, many parents prefer home-schooling because they believe that their children can benefit from one-on-one attention. As a result, the proposed measure may not be implemented successfully.
In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining whether the teenagers should receive full-time education. I think that the government still nedd to provide better teaching quality in each lession at classes. While receiving a full-time studying is better for both students and society, the lack of time and financial resources remains a problem