According to some, rural areas are the great choice to live in, while many people argue that living in cities best option. Although there are some strong arguments on both of these sides, I would side with the latter group for people for some sound reasons.
On the one hand, life expectancy in villages has its drawbacks. That is, some people do not manage to find work. If they found a job they had to work for extremely low wages. As some local citizens an example, every single year they try to move on to modern buildings, which means that, rural areas lack a sense of community and there is a gap between the rich and poor. In contrast, if the government had provided good salaried jobs for the local population, they would have stayed own place. Moreover, villages are sometimes described as “concrete jungles”.
On the other hand, I believe that life in cities is much more efficient and always there may be lots of options for all things. To explain, if we want to see a good quality of life, we will try to move on there. Therefore, many people are coming here to other places. For instance, in many jungle areas population shifted to cities in search of job opportunities which means that cities offer greater employment possibilities and a higher standard of living. If it were not, life in urban areas would not be convenient and comfortable. Therefore, people migrate to cities from the countryside.
In conclusion, however, the lack of opportunities could cause some problems in rural areas, I feel that always urban areas provide us much more actions than we expected.