There is a debate over whch type of learning is best, with some saying competition is the most optimal way and other arguing that the cooperation is better method to study at school. I believe, while partnership have some benefits such as improving teamwork skills, rivalry still remains the most effective way for students as it can develop prolem-solving skills and the students get motivated.
Collaboration can be an efficient way to sudy at school. The ability to work in a team to achieve a common goal is an invaluable quality that must be have in the real world, especially in a career plan.This is because students who work together as a team share a common goal: a successful project. Compared to single-person work, teamwork is very fun, interesting and can clarify the misunderstood part at any time.
However, competitive lessons are still a better choice in school. The main reason for the competition is motivation. Teamwork can motivate strong members of a group, but weak members are left without it, and the strong should help them. When students are put to compete, they force themselves to make every effort to succeed.
Rivalry can also develop problem-solving skills. Problem solving develops at a time when a person thinks independently and finds a solution based on his interests. When people work in a team, they start solving problems together and in the future they cannot solve their problems without their group. But when people work independently, they solve their problems on their own, without the participation of other people.
In conclusion, collaboration has own unique advantages over competition, as it impove teamwork skills. That said, rivalry is the best way to study at school because it improve problem-solving skills and gives motivation.