It is believed by many individuals that the necessity of land for humans is more predominant than preserving land for animals. Nevertheless, in my opinion, I do not concur with the proponents of the aforementioned viewpoint.
The first and foremost reason to support my viewpoint is that animals cannot live together with humans. This is dangerous for animals as well as for people. Therefore, saving land for animals for their living and feeding is humans’ paramount role because some wild animals cannot change their living patterns. For example, a zoo is an artificial home for animals that provides an accurate environment similar to a forest, but some wild animals cannot live in it. They feel isolated even when surrounded by many people.
Moreover, although for humankind’s development and fulfilling individuals’ needs, cutting down the forest is essential to some extent, it cannot be ignored that the forest is the only home for many wild creatures and animals. If people continuously demolish the forest, this will pave the way for various detrimental results. Therefore, this action will not only trigger a shortage of land for wild animals but also affect the life cycle of animal species. So, saving land for animals is a very crucial thing to be noticed.
In conclusion, even though some advocates opine that humans need land more than animals, I oppose the view that preserving lands for animals does not help them survive in their own space.