There is an ongoing debate about whether adapting to climate change through various strategies should be more prioritised over combating it. I vehemently oppose with this notion of coexisting with climate transformation rather than tackling it. Since it has detrimental effects on environment and human lives. In this following paragraphs, I will explore the hazardous consequences of this approach and advocate for tackling climate change through sustainable practices and renewable energy alternatives.
Primarily, the idea of embracing the adoption of climate change might bring hazardous impacts on ecosystem and biodiversity. Industrial sectors and their production systems have been relying on non-renewable energy, resulting in massive carbon emissions. Consequently, it is leading to rising sea-levels, increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and so on. In that case, government can impose higher price and tax for fuel based production so that manufacturing sectors might reduce its uses. For instance, regime can introduce advanced methods of using renewable sources for manufacturing instead of using nonrenewable energy.
Furthermore, if a nation get used with other means for accepting its change then the environment might turn into a desert. In this fast paced world, the uses of air conditioner and other technologies both at home and office increasing at an unprecedented rate; these electrical appliances consume electricity enormously which elevates major threat to the ecosystem and its surrounding species. This earth is on its way of losing some valuable creatures. Lots of species are at risk of extinction such as polar bears and penguin living in Antartica.
To conclude, dealing with climate change is not a better approach because it will eventually lead a destruction to the environment and create danger on earth, so it would be better to look for solutions and apply consistent efforts to tackle this change.