Some people argue that a horizontal city is the best place to live, while others believe that a vertical city is more suitable for our livelihood. I would argue that it would be better to reside in a high-rise building.
On the one hand, a horizontal city has its own merits. Horizontal cities typically offer more space per person, with larger homes, yards, and private gardens. This setup is ideal for those who value privacy and outdoor space. With more green spaces and less dense construction, horizontal cities often have a closer connection to nature, which can be beneficial for mental and physical health. Moreover, neighborhoods in horizontal cities may foster a stronger sense of community, as residents have more opportunities to interact in shared outdoor spaces.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that vertical cities are much more advantageous. The first benefit is that vertical cities, characterized by high-rise buildings and dense urban development, make efficient use of limited land, accommodating more people in a smaller area. Another benefit is that with everything closer together—homes, workplaces, shops, and entertainment—residents often enjoy shorter commutes and the convenience of having amenities nearby. For instance, vertical cities can be more environmentally sustainable, as they require less land and can incorporate green technologies like energy-efficient buildings and public transportation.In conclusion, it seems to me that it is better to live in a vertical city.