Many people believe that the job where people spend their significant amout of time should be satisficating, however there are also numerous people who think that job have to give the permanence. I personally believe that working in the place that you can not stand always leads the unpleasant outcomes.
Many indivualities often have to face to the problem with the unpleasant job occupation. It is widely spreaded that the person in spite of everything just keep working where they do not have an affection. I think it is the problem that might lead to various health and menthal diseases. For instance, doing any activity that the person do not like. The person will not feel themselve great. It will just make them more desperate. As an outcome there are the problems like: always being nervous, anxiety, stress. And stress is initially affects for the healht-related problems.
On the other hand, I do not hold the opinion that person always has the need to give more preferance to the satisfaction. I think by pritorizing people deal with preferance and the work permanence. Job should require for the employee satisfaction their demands. For example, the people who choose a job by only whether they like or not and the people that make choice in the middle ground. It is the need because, work always have to require consistence.
By discussing both views I made a conclusion that job is a improtant part of life due to people spend 1/3 their life. In this case, it is more profitable to choose satisfaction at first over the permanence. However, without permanence it is unlikely to get a chance to “choose”.
