It is contended by some people that learning should be occured in a stage of life. However , there is arguement that studying not only takes place in a period time but also maintances permenently.. This essay will not only analyze the first opinion, but also hightlight aspects of the second one.
First and foremost, there is an idea supporting the traditional education which is at school and university. Formal programme provide student foundational knowledge and qualìfication, which is essential for their future carreer. The notice point is that , learning in particular time and place offers the certain curricula and designed programme which are intructed by certificated teacher .For instance, in Viet Nam, it is mandatory to attenf school until the age of 16.
On the other hand, the extent perpective is that absorbing knowlegde is the continuous process which can educate you everywhere and everytime and last forever. Following the developement of the technology, it consults the conveniene that you can access internet immediately and search for everything you want just in a second. Therefore, it does not require paritcular timetables or plans. Futhermore, there is convince arguement that studying has no destionation, which means it can prolong until the entire of time. Right off the top of my mind, i can state that medicine is the best evidence. The new year comes with the new diseases borned, it demands the doctors always have to enhance their skills and update informations to combat with disaster such as COVID 19.
In comprehension, weighing both views, they have their own merits and dismerits. So it is still more reasonable to conclude that balances as well as takes advantage of two perspectives is the smartest choice.