The debate over newly built houses should match the local styles or allow personal expressions is pretty complex.A balanced approach , where cultural heritage is maintained and innovations innovations are allowed is necessary for proper development of the area.
On the one hand , preserving historical aesthetics is an integral part of most of ancient civilizations which still have their own mark in modern society . For instance, city of Rome Italia , Kyoto in Japan or Bruges in Belgium all attract tourist because of their unique historical appearance.In addition , the buildings are usually well-suited to the geographical location and climate , making them both suitable and practical .
On other hand completely restricting innovation may hinder the progress.Also , stifling creativity would negatively reflect the evolving nature of community and if historical uniformity was strictly enforced in past , many modeern landmarks, such as Dubai skyscrapers and inimitable Tokyo buildings , would not exist nowadays.
A practical solution would be to implement flexible regulations . Authorities should set a rules which would protect heritage aesthetics and atmosphere , while still allowing for modern elements. Such approach is successfully working in city of Paris where new bulduings complement old structures with replicating them .
In the conclusion , a well-regulated balance between preservations and innovations is the best way to ensure progressive growth .