There is an amount of people who believe that authorities should replace huge places like parks or gardens with buldings to cushion the time taken for traveling from houses to workplaces, wheares some do not. From my perspective, I disagree with the beyound statement.
Primarily, parks and flower gardens are places which need a massive area to locate. Therefore, enormous companies or workplaces have the scaricity of spaces in the city center for structuring and offices have to be moved to the surban areas. As a result, commuters are forced to spend more time traveling from home which they are able to use for taking care of themselves and their family members. However, as an educator caring and sharing about climate change and environmental pollution, this advantage of parks replacement is not appropriate.
First and foremost, in the contemporary context, citizens have found their hobbies mostly in their technological equipments, parks are areas where people can merge themselves into nature. Walking or jogging in the park enhances not only dwellers’ health but also individuals connection after sitting in front of laptops or computers for eight hours. Moreover, parks are ideal locations for small picnics in order to bond relationship with family and friends. Besides leisure activities, as carbon dioxide emission is a thorny proplem thesedays, natural parks or gradens elemation is almost like destroying green evironments that are saviors for polluted environment, especially aiir pollution in modern cities.
In conclusion, I do think that there are numbers of methods for consuming the traveling time for commuters that are not nature damage.