Nowadays, there are some individuals who endorse the idea of creation global language for international communication. While this could entail some benefits, such as easier worldwide communication, I believe that drawbacks of invention universal language outweigh advantages.
On the one hand, the invention of completely new language, which will satisfy majority of nations, involves variety of difficulties in all stages: creation, integration and promotion. First of all, new language should be composed so that it will be easy to master for everyone, from Chinese to Uzbek. Specifically, considering that all languages fundamentally differ in terms of pronunciation and spelling, it will be difficult for everyone to re-adapt to the new language. Furthermore, when global language is created, it should be integrated to international organizations, public schools, and government agencies around the world. However, employee and students will struggle to learn new language, so the efficiency and convenience of work will decrease during the adaptation. Additionally, it is not guaranteed that all nations will accept new universal language as it may cause their mother tongue to disappear. Learning another language at schools and communicating outdoors may put local language under extinction in future.
While these disadvantages are serious, benefits of global language partly cover up the shortcomings. These days, a lot of experts all over the world make new inventions and scientific publications on different languages, which hurdles knowledge and experience exchange. However, common language will make it easier to great minds to collaborate and probably will boost development. Secondly, with the global language, communication amid nations, such as political negotiations and simple conversations, will be more convenient. This will provide an opportunity to share own ideas, cultural traditions and intends with people all over the words.
In conclusion, although universal language could improve global communication and cooperation, the difficulties of creating, implementing, and gaining acceptance for such a language are greater.
