Crime is one of the major problems that are happening in this wide world. Some people believes that for a specific crime, there should be a death penalty given for the individuals or groups who did the crime. On the other hand, people believe there are better alternative for reducing crime.
Some countries already applied the method of giving a death penalties which the majority of people agreed to. For example, China applied a death penalties for corruptors who stole the government money or important things that could lead to economical and stability problems. Death penalties are effective to reduce the chance of individuals or groups to do a particular crime and increase the number of honesty in the country. Furthermore, Death penalties is effective to assure that this particular individuals or groups wouldn’t be able to do thing again. With this method, death penalties could lead to an increase number of fear for doing a crime and avoid any bad behaviours in the environment.
But, some people believe that death penalties isn’t the only way to reduce crime. Some people believe that death penalties aren’t a better way to provide peace and it’s disrespecting the individuals or groups life. There are another way to reduce crime in a particular countries such as, giving a life sentence for a major crimes, increasing the overall security in the environment, and make sure that all aspect in that countries are fulfilled. This steps could lead to a decreasing number of crimes consistently and removing the perspective that crime is the only way to survive in this cruel world.
In conclusion, some people or even countries believe that death penalty is a must for a particular crime to reduce that chance of that crime to be repeated again. While the other believe that death penalty isn’t an effective way to reduce crime because there are other steps such as giving a life sentence, increasing overall security, and the fulfillment of all aspect in that countries.