There is a thought by certain individuals that the government should encourage artist in varying skills, such as painters, musicians, and poets, by contrast other’s opined it as a waste of money. Overall, it is evident that the skills mentioned are not relatively cheap but with some support from the government they could be more enhanced in the society.
Primarily, musicians and painters are great profession which can do well on their own for instance they do concerts and sell out tickets which comes in various categories( VVIPs, VIPs and Regulars), and painters have galleries in which their piece are sold. However for poetry in today’s world a lot of people from this generation can’t figure what poem is all about and in those days there were significant feature in cultural background used in keep historical figures and facts and also help in shaping individuals behavior.
In the society today, governments can sponsor art exhibitions, musical talents as way of developing the communities and also bringing of people from different background and culture together to promote oneness and also creating employment opportunities for its citizens.
However, why certain people believed government assisting such skills as waste of money is because they see them as something not serious, but reverse is the case as lately, musicians are one of the top rich people globally, a piece of art could also cost a fortune as technology has help in improving them through power of the internet.
In conclusion, government encouraging talented individuals such as musicians, poetry and painters is a way of creating job opportunities and solving financial hardship in the economy through exhibitions, talent hunts and skill acquisitions programs and not a waste of money.