Without a doubt, artifical intelligence becomes an imperitive part of everyones’ life, which cannot be resist as people use it in direct or indirect way on regular basis. Arguing that humanroid educators are replaceable with rebots is baseless and i compeletly disagree with this statement as rebots have lack of disciplain, limited acess of knowlege and lack of emotional intelligence. In the upcoming pharagraph, i will discuss why i disagree with his statement.
initialy, educating students require to maintian the disciplain in the classroom, which faciliate students to focus on their education and grab the information in an effective way. however, only human educators can understand when and where and which studnet is underestimating this value. For example, while a student is cheating in the class, rebots cannot detect movement of eyes and expressions, whereas, i teacher can esaily caught it, as he has the knowledgement of person’s intentions. Consequently, a fair and disciplained environment can be maintained.
Secondly, although rebots cover broader area of information in terms of reasoning, facts and history, they has fixed knowledge about the future prediction. For instance, weather forecasting both histroical data and human intuitions. Howevers, rebots can only used the patterns which were programmed in them from the past. as a result, rebot is unable to predict accurately. so, how students can learn from a rebot ,which already has limited acess to knowledge. In additon, rebots also have lack of emtions like empathy, sympathy, affection and so on. this can be developed among them them through teachers.
In conclusion, rebots cannot replace educators as they neither have disciplain nor required knowedge or emtional values.