Olympics is an internationaly recognized sports event and many countries participate for that event not only as players, there are thousans of viewers. People have two types of arguments for the Olympic. Firstly, Olympics do more harm than benefits, because of the high costs and community replacements, and other arguemt is Olympics promote global relationship and boost local economies.
Disscuss about harm from Olympics, main issue is displacement of communities. Due to new construction the local goverment have do change the locations of local communities. Because of that peoples face a lots of problems. Such as, they lost there own home, businesses, and even government buildings also. Not only that, it cause several pollutions and harm environmet. Those people have to adupte for their new accomadations and their new lifestyles. It will be morechallenging for senior citizens rather than the younger peoples. Moreover, developing Olympics villages will expensive. Providing all the required facilities including foods, medicines, practice centres etc.
On the other hand, discussing about development of global relationship and growing local economies; Olympics sports event play major role in its. The sponserd country recive the people from across the world, so the sponserd country will earn begininng from the airport. Local business owners can boost they income through the Olympics, such as; foods, clothes, medicines, art and crafts, and even culture and tourists attraction places also can promote at that time period. Specially, considering the governers view Olympics strength the global relationships from hospitality, global businness, technology, culture etc.
Based on those discussion, I believe the Olympics makes more benefits for the sponserd country rather than the harms that made.