Nowadays, English, to improve tourism, is the most considerable language used by many countries in all societies. Some believe that English will be a common language in communication in the whole world because of its flexibility, although there is also an argument that opposes it. In this essay, I will examine both of these aspects in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand having united language will have various advantages. To begin with, it will provide easily communication with foreigners and understanding local culture. For instance, if visitors would ask others about the right location to their destination, then common language would be significantly effective in order to understand the citizens of these areas. Furthermore, another positive aspect is the tourism industry could accomplish higher revenue. When the population do not have any concern about new languages, they travel all around the world easily especially those who are old.
On the other hand, by losing the local language, we may forget so many valuable features such as cultural heritage, and our history. The language of each community is considered an identity of that nation and if you get that from people, they may lose their identification. Another drawback of this change are community may lose their sense of speaking. They learn the language when they were a child, and they learn to express their feeling, and they practise it for so many years but replacing it with a new one requires a lot of time and effort.
In conclusion, having similar language can provide lots of benefits, including easily contacts with outlanders and arising tourism. However there are few drawbacks such as losing traditional culture and difficulties in adaptation.