Today, in the world which is considered to be an ecological environment to a seemingly infinite variety of species, the question of whether people should become extinct, so that it facilitates the lives of other creatures, remains controversial. This essay diagrees with the statement. I believe that people are ecological integrations and their presence on the planet is crucial.
Some individuals tend to claim that human-beings have no significance on earth and their absence would only refine the quality of life of other kinds. However, this point of view lacks reasonableness. From my perspective, none of the species deserve to be nonexistent, due to the reason that they are all interrelated to one another and associated with biodiversity. If humanity dissapears, the whole ecosystem might suffer. Consequently, people should not be viewes as species whose disasppearence would impove the state on earth.
Above all, the human vacancy could have a negative impact on the wildlife. Although human-beings caused a lot of harm towards the ecological environment, they still contribute to the protection of ecosystems and mant kinds of species. For instance, people build national parks, try to preserve endangered plants and animals, and guard the planet from possible threats. Furthermore, if humanity is truly set to dissapear, it can severely damage the wildlife. Abandoned industrial areas and nuclear power stations might cause a serious harm to the environment without maintenance. Therefore, instead of peirceiving people as a danger, humanity should focuse on reducing their harmful impact on the planet.
In conclusion, despite the fact that human beings have a negative influence on the ecosystem, their presence is not necessarily detrimental to other species. People still have an ability to preserve the environment, and since everything is interrelated, their absence can disrupt biodiversity.