Many people around the world experience the overbearing dominance of the American film industry. These films are shown in nearly every corner of the planet, and some people believe they have negative effects on local culture and traditions. I would agree that local governments should allocate budgets to support domestic film-makers, but I also see some benefits to American films.
Hollywood movies cost a great deal to make. This makes them spectacular to watch. Offering people a degree of escapism from their daily lives and give them a window to experience a different side of the world. Because of this, many people gravitate toward American cinema, which is why it is so popular around the world.
However, since the dawn of the American film industry’s dominance, an idealistic image of the American lifestyle has been created around the world, portraying an over-exaggerated way of living and spending. Some commentators believe this image has pushed many people toward consumerism, pulling them away from their cities and leading them pursue a fast-paced life in the hopes of making more money to feed the desires created by American cinema. For example, flamboyant fashion has become a standard, and changes in what people eat and how they act are all results of this transition that causes a shift in traditions and culture.
A proposed solution to this problem is subsidization of filmmakers buy local governments. This support can enable movie makers to showcase the country’s history and embrace their traditions and culture. Such movies can make people appreciate their origins and give them a feeling of belonging which in return preserves a country’s culture and values.
To conclude, American movies are global spectacles due to their huge costs. However, entertainment should not be the only criterion for films. Since they can alter cultural norms. Local governments have a duty to protect culture by subsidizing their film industries.