Some argue that today, the earth is a much more secure place to live than before, therefore, authorities in some countries should reduce their expenditure on strengthening military power to serve other purposes. This essay will delve into this discourse, exploring the merits of each perspective and ultimately presenting a balanced view on the matter.
On the one hand, advocates of the topic described above argue that the world in recent years has become safer, due to the fact that many conflicts, riots, or provocations causing wars, and division have decreased remarkably thanks to measures taken by governments to resolve the contradiction around the world. Consequently, supporters recommend that governments should not squander national financial resources to the army. Instead, money should be used for other urgent requirements for citizens such as education, medical services, social welfare, etc. People in such nations need their government’s attention to enhance their lives. Giving superior interest in military issues may even not create safety for inhabitants, it could be counter-productive. If a country spends money to develop arms and ammunition, or invent new dangerous weapons with catastrophic destruction may be regarded as actions to provoke wars. This would grab other countries’ attention, especially neighboring nations and they would soon have implemented solutions to restrict this thing. It could lead to the tension of diplomatic relations among countries, affecting the stability of worldwide peace.
On the other hand, skeptics might claim that it is not trivial to be apathetic about military affairs. The global problems have never come to an end, there have always been some external threats impacting the steadiness of many nations. As a result, using national financial potential to intensify armed forces can be seen as an essential way for protection. For instance, North Korea, a country that suffered from many restrictions and has always been supervised by other nations, needs to protect itself by continually upgrading its nuclear weapons arsenal. By this measure, they can give a warning to any enemies having the intention to harm North Korea’s safety.
In conclusion, while the emphasis on the cutting down on the outlay for military issues stands as of paramount importance, it is equally crucial to strike a judicious balance between citizens’ requisite and national security. Governments should implement clear-sighted policies to ensure people’s lives and protect them from harm from outside.