Many people choose to reside in another nation aprt from their home-country. I believe that it is subjective for the individuals to live wherever they want to and legal restrications over freedom to live is highlu unethical to impose on the society as a constitutional straint. The idea of moving to a different country brings a lot of career prospects to grow professionaly and gain financial assets for many. On the contrary, the their are several demerits as well including, specific restrictions for the foreigners as well as the high investments required while settling down in a country initially.
The world-wide requirement of skilled professionals lures people to move to different nations and pursue various lucrative offers . Majority of the individuals dream of financial independency and upgarde into better living standards, which is doable with such prospects ahead. For example, doctors in the UK and USA are provided with world-class facilities and a better work-life balance with loads of money as compared to Indian hospitals where teh wages are lower and the work-load is over the top.
On the other hand, the inital stages of migrating to another nation is an exhausting and highly expensive process (including travels, insurance, visa, living expenditures and so on) , which is a matter of concern for a lot of people. Furthermore, while living as well their are tones of restrications and limitations that someone can face. For instance, carrying passport is a necessary by the foreigners all the time, some may also face sterotypical racism.
In conclusion, migrating to another country is a personal decision of the people and has it’s own positive and negative aspects . One may prioritize accordingly to his/her wishes and choose whether to continue living in their own country oe relocate to a different one.