Some argue that affluent nations should provide humanitarian aid to less developed countries when natural disasters occur. In this essay, I strongly agree with sending assistance to these countries because it fulfills a global mandate and strengthens diplomatic relationships.
Developed countries that are members of the United Nations should adhere to the established mandate of helping poorer countries during natural disasters. The UN has been fostering these philanthropic values for decades, as its board of members believes that disasters are beyond human control and require humanitarian assistance. For example, in 2004, the United States and several European countries sent various forms of aid to Indonesia when a devastating tsunami struck. Some countries provided goods and supplies, while others offered financial support.
Providing assistance to less fortunate countries during disasters can significantly strengthen relationships among nations. This humanitarian aid demonstrates how international relief efforts can lead to improved diplomatic relations and, furthermore, opens avenues for increased cooperation between the countries involved. Continuing with the aforementioned example, after Indonesia recovered from the tsunami, its diplomatic relations with several countries improved. This led to new trade policies between Indonesia and European countries, as well as initiatives for developing social and cultural heritage programs.
In conclusion, wealthy nations should provide humanitarian aid to poorer countries during natural disasters for two main reasons. Firstly, it fulfills the United Nations’ mandate to assist countries in need. Secondly, it can improve diplomatic relations among countries after the crisis has passed, bringing numerous benefits to both the donor and recipient nations.