People have different views whether; wild animals should not exist in the technology age and defending them is just an inappropriate use of resources, and others oppose this opinion. I totally agree that we should not waste recources to protect wild animals.
On the one hand, some argue that animals should not be exsisting in the period of modern technolgy. Animals have stronger immune systems compared to human beings and they tend to disseminate some diseases on which humans are vulnerable. Letting animals to keep spreading viruses may end up fatal for humans because they are prone to illnesses. Nowadays we are living in the new era where cognitive abilities which humans possess rule the whole world, while dumb creatures such as wild animals just don’t take crucial role overall.
On the other hand, we believe that wasting resurces to protect animals is just inapproptiate.It is clear that both natural and artificial reources are becoming deficient. Firstly, problems with global warming and overpopulation cause to shortage of resources Therefore, we should implement that resources on something more important. Secondly, laws of nature impose animals to evolve and increase their ablitity to protect them selves. Even existence of some particular species might be beneficial. It does not mean that humans should contribute should contribute endangered animals with their resources.
In conclusion, it is clear that animals do not take dramatic role in the grand schemes of everything.So, this essay completely supports view that animals should not be protected for reasons above.