With the development of individual medicine, group of individuals think that healthcare shold be rigged to personal genetic information, while other people find this way exacerbating inequality among humanity. Both sides of this debate will be analysed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Firstly, tailoring healthcare to individual profiles is kinda good solution to manage the problem of inconsistencies in diagnoses. Often, doctors can give to the sick people inaccurate results of their analysis and after that prescribe incorrect medications. So, because of that type of errors, healthcare government should adjust personal genetic information into their medicine cards. This will cause a lot of benefits in treatment of serious diseases and make it much faster than the traditional way.
On the other hand, this kind of innovations can cause a lot of social problems, like inequalities around the people. Some persons can not spend that much money only on their healthcare, and it is definitely going to be really expensive for the common people with average salary. After that changes will bring significant disparity in healthcare around simple and rich people, which will definitely make bad influence on the quality of their treatment.
In summary, both sides of the discussion that tailoring healthcare to personal datas have strong support. However, after analysing the two camps, it is cleat that this innovations could exacerbate health inequalities.It is recommended not to develop that kind of prejudices in society and make only useful and unified innovations.