It is thought that punishing a murderer as a death penalty so that society is also included as a guilty side, while it is also believed that life in a prison is great way to act against murderer . In my opinion , i agree with that statement that imprisonment for the lifetime is the best way to punish a murderer because, while staying at a government can be benefited by economically .
On the one hand , a jail life could be tough for a lifetime murderer so because of this government has imply a rules that in every prison need to have some activity such as doing farming , textile factories , making souvenirs etc . As a result , government can be benefited by this way . Moreover, if a jailer do these works so that those things could be supply in markets for sell. For example , In the UK , in a survey have shown that in their economy 20% amount are coming from a jail where murderers did farming and made wedding dresses . So that is how by avoiding death penalty for a murderer Government could be benefited by economically
Furthermore , murder is not a big issue for people nowadays so because of this murder ratio has become increased because of that police had to penalised them as a act of death . As a result , people will be afraid to do this crime . Moreover , sometime innocent people had to hug up on a rope so we should punish them as a lifetime imprisonment.
In conclusion , by punishing a murderer as a lifetime imprisonment government can be benefited by economically . On the other hand , punishing as a death penalty some innocent people could be death and that should not be happened .