The concern of public, government and activists is increasing day by day related to pollution. Some people believe that government involvement in public transport system and reduction in ticket prices could lead to significant results in controlling pollution, while others counter this opinion by stating that there could be far better approaches than this. I, however, believe that allocating funds to public transport by government and cheaper tickets are the best strategies to reduce pollution.
Some people think that reducing ticker prices should not be the preferrable option, instead education and awareness should be preferred options. Good transport system and lower ticket prices in Australis, for example, could not bound people to avoid throwing waste and wrappers out from windows of buses and trains. Additionally, people might not value cheaper and some notorious children may harm the vehicles. Therefore, campaigns to spread awareness would be the best approach instead more investments and inexpensive tickets.
On the other hand, others maintain that government should invest a significant amount of funds to improve the quality of engine, which is the major cause of pollution. Additionally, funding should be allocated for stations and maintaining its services, leading to attract more people. Furthermore, reduction in ticket prices could allow more people to travel in public transports, resulting in reduction in traffic congestion and eventually dramatic reduction in pollution.
This essay argued that how government attention to public transport sector and making it inexpensive could help to control the pollution and why others think that other alternatives should be taken into account than this. In my opinion, government allotment to public transport system from its share can help in significantly decrease in pollution. In addition to it, reduction in ticket prices is also a outstanding strategy which can assist to overcome pollution.