A number of individuals reckon that cities should have more modern buildings to replace the dated buildings and houses. However, some people think that these old buildings should stay. The following essay will take a look on both arguments to this problem.
With cities being much modern than it was back then, it is understandable that people think the older buildings and houses from the past seem out of place. For instance, wouldn’t it be odd if you see those tall skyscrapers and cooperation companies right next to an old architectural building? It would break the overall tone of the modern city. Additionally, because these modern cities are usually linked to the redevelopment of technology and economic status, residents might want to maintain that image. Hence is why many people argue that these old buildings should be replaced.
Conversely, other people think that these old buildings are one of the icons of the city. It has been with them since the past, and should be maintained to keep history alive. These buildings are not just simply old structures, it contains many meanings and stories from the past. For example, the old architectural buildings left by colonialization has been kept in my country to pay respect to those who fought for the country back then. To remember the important history that happened in the country. Although it is located in the middle of the modern city, it actually makes the city more distinct and personal. That is why people think it is not needed for these structures to be demolished.
In conclusion, I think that it is completely unnecessary to replace these old buildings with modern ones. Although urbanization has taken over many cities, these old buildings hold a special place in many peoples hearts with its history, hence should be maintained and protected instead.