In the contemporary epoch, whilst opponents hold the view that reserves should be forbidden for animal rights, proponents have a diverse view. However I am staunch believer that natural parks are very indispensable to safeguard wildlife, and both sides of the arguments will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, a category of individuals argues that capturing such living beings and placing them in cages violates their rights. To illustrate, if these mammals and fowls are locked in artificial woods in order to entertain the visitors, this affects determinately their behaviors and lives. A prime example is Africa forests, where various wild animals inhabit, without being jailed owing to the fact that the vacationers enjoy watching them. Hence, it can be said such living souls are entitled to have freedom like humans.
On the other hand, the critics of the above view believe that zoological gardens are supposed to be established to provide rare species with safe environment. In other words, when wild animals and birds have certain forests that are supervised by the authorities, this bans haunters to catch these animals for its leathers and several purposes. This can be exemplified in pandas and tigers, whose furs are contemplated the most expensive materials. Consequently, allocating greenish lands and zookeepers for such creatures preserves them against extinction.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned, it can be reiterated that zoos are considered quintessential reserves for all animals from being endangered. Therefore, I am convinced that man-made jungles contribute to wildlife conversation.