There are differing opinions on whether under-developed countries should participate in international philanthropic activities. Personally, I strongly believe that these countries should be excluded from such plans.
Those who support the participation of all countries, even undeveloped ones, in global donation plans have clear arguments for their stance. They typically assert that all humans are responsible to help their peers and should maintain this commitment regardless of their status quo. For example, if a certain country is struggling with difficult financial issues and have poor people, it should help other nations for the sake of humanitarian purposes. This perspective would potentially foster a sense of affection and care among different nations, contributing to tighten their international relations.
However, in my view, poor countries should initially enhance their own condition. We should classify various problems and prioritize them according to their importance. There is nothing more important than internal issues of each country. If a poor country solves its own economic problems, it can consequently be strong enough one day to help other nations. So instead of being a donator, they should a destination for other nation’s donations. This will lead to an integrate satisfaction in these countries, which is a basic crucial requirement when considering donations to other parts of the world.
In conclusion, while it may bring emotional gains for a poor country to help other nations, its financial drawbacks would make this activity irrational. Therefore, it is essential to deal with their own setbacks, at the first level.